tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5743370102334877264.post2006028835545165913..comments2023-04-05T09:07:08.419-07:00Comments on Fides et Ratio: Just for kicks...Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07034462951274070391noreply@blogger.comBlogger5125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5743370102334877264.post-74394150536813353032010-08-23T07:52:42.235-07:002010-08-23T07:52:42.235-07:00As promised, here are some reflections on your pla...As promised, here are some reflections on your playful argument. http://veniaminov.blogspot.com/2010/08/scotist-anselmian-argument-for-god.htmlCodgitator (Cadgertator)https://www.blogger.com/profile/00872093788960965392noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5743370102334877264.post-52850127931297122362010-08-23T05:28:54.079-07:002010-08-23T05:28:54.079-07:00Oh, I know, the SCG was a godsend (quite!) when I ...Oh, I know, the SCG was a godsend (quite!) when I was first becoming a Catholic. People often read the ST and say, "That's nice... but... where's the beef?" In the SCG!Codgitator (Cadgertator)https://www.blogger.com/profile/00872093788960965392noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5743370102334877264.post-33338381540353706562010-08-23T00:39:35.492-07:002010-08-23T00:39:35.492-07:00Codgitator, thanks for the link. I will be sure t...Codgitator, thanks for the link. I will be sure to check that out. I can never emphasize the importance of SCG enough. I highly recommend that material, even over the ST, for its in depth analysis of metaphysical issues, especially those concerning God.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07034462951274070391noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5743370102334877264.post-6191926403707626322010-08-22T23:33:53.837-07:002010-08-22T23:33:53.837-07:00You have written about Scotus' modal argument ...You have written about Scotus' modal argument for the Uncaused Causer, an argument to which I am very sympathetic. I wonder if this "joke" argument might not be a super-condensed version of that argument. <br /><br />Also, I'm working through SCG on my blog, a chapter every few days, and chapter xx of book 1 was very rich (today). I think it offers a lot of material as to why Rowe's eternal-star rejoinder to Scotus' argument fails. Deus non est corpus! http://veniaminov.blogspot.com/2010/08/reading-summa-contra-gentiles.htmlCodgitator (Cadgertator)https://www.blogger.com/profile/00872093788960965392noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5743370102334877264.post-82857925038341129382010-08-21T20:38:26.377-07:002010-08-21T20:38:26.377-07:00That's great haha! I'll be pondering it, i...That's great haha! I'll be pondering it, its just-for-kicksness notwithstanding.Codgitator (Cadgertator)https://www.blogger.com/profile/00872093788960965392noreply@blogger.com